Friday, February 04, 2005

the internet and the PRC

I've hated our involvement with the greed-hegemonist chest-beating, ambitious, capricious, bloodyminded tyranny in the far east..... errrr, our 'strategic partner' in the far east by the name of the Peoples' Republic of China.

I vigorously opposed PNTR with the PRC and figured its disidents knew it for what it is, a lying, capricious, ambitious society viewing us as inferior, and we have been greedy fools with regard to our interaction with the prc, and keeping our profits there, viewing this as 'tribute' from an inferior people.

Few americans realize this was an absolutely foolish relationship with which we engaged, and although Stoessinger while at RAND exposed the PRC ("Nations in Darkness: China, Russia, America, 1970) for what it is, he left open the question if we should engage with the PRC. 2 years later Nixon and Kissinger went to China.

In a discourse in 2001 I had with PriceWaterhouseCoopers' top engagement partner who had returned to the west after being in the PRC for 5 years, we agreed on every one of my talking points which noted the sad and reasonably transparent truth to which he somewhat spoke and to which he agreed when I pointedly exposed the reality of our situation in the PRC. As a brit and with business being the business nazi/fascist policy of life as many of the elite (and contemporary "Crown") brits are so slick peddle, he believed in spite of the very bad news we discussed at the Union League club to a Foreign Policy Association gathering to which he spoke, we should engage with the PRC because, in effect, it's so big, when most of it doesnt really count for anything in comparison economically to what americans can do, and far less there count with regard to their wallet and voice than here... and for all the reasons - all actually quite negative - to which he thinks we should engage, to the contrary I think we should cut our losses and retrench domestically.

We're the biggest wallet in the world of which EVERYONE wants a piece. so if we are our own biggest wallet, we need to keep it for ourselves, re-establishing our own wealth, building up each other....this is part of what made us great...and as william penn believed, no man got wealthy alone... we are not for people who think us inferior, and that our commerce there (in the PRC) is tribute to them that they keep when they are violating contracts by doing such...

this all is a long, longer than a soundbit, newsday post.

our corporations early on had large losses there when we were looking for china to be an end market for our finished goods. we got hosed with the taxpayer and the nonmanagement shareholder eating the losses, while management and the prc boogied with our money....

And meanwhile, they kept our profits which to which they'd agreed was our split in the deals BY CONTRACT. THE PRC IS NOT A SOCIETY THAT WORKS BY CONTRACT. IT WAS NOT IS NOT A RULE OF LAW SOCIETY.. WITH OUR WRITTEN CONSTITUTION HAVING BEEN THE BEST EXAMPLE AT ONE POINT OF RULE OF LAW AND A SOCIETY THAT ANSWERS TO WRITTEN RULE OF LAW.

so we are building china, we are what makes that place hum with all of their cooly labor. but it's our taxpayers and americans buying cheap cooly produced goods that verves that place.

we need to stop vote american with our wallets and follow our Constitution and hit all imports with tariffs, duties and excise taxes. Art1,Sect8 of our Constitution. there is no argument for 'free' trade in our Constitution, even if one wants to parce it loosely.

this is a major soap box for me, but i warned mccain and the others to oppose pntr with the prc.. and mccain and the others thought it a big deal about the internet there; that the internet was 'freedom' there. and notice our elected public servants seem to prefer the word freedom to the word liberty which suddenly george bush seems to fancy. what's the scoop? I noticed he is also using the expression of ownership... as this new back to the future old piracy policy about social security into the rigged markets to line wall street's and corporate cronies' pockets.

delay, who i met at the convention in philadelphia in 2000... and when i had the opportunity to ask him why when he'd first opposed pntr why he sided with clinton about pntr, he said he went to china and saw all those entrepreneurs -and i saw this glow in his eyes.. i felt a little pity for him and knew what had hit him while there... I knew they targetted him for an OP, psi coolaid of the mindcontrol sort and that was it. they marched him around all those 'entrepreneurs' that the goons in the prc leave to act as some head fake and front of a developing 'market' economy so as to fake out the west....and he was unaware of what hit him and he supported pntr... i was glad to hear it for myself from the horse's mouth, and actually glad to meet him.

but if mccain thinks the internet is going to bring down the tyranny of the prc, what goes around comes around, and the internet will bring down the tyranny here.

why do you think tenet and wolfowitz think the internet here should be controlled? because people like me and the cia perp who feeds me info - often lies, but sometimes some workable info that wasnt anything that i wouldnt have figured for myself, or already knew but the perp and those on his end reminded me.... but when I emailed that tenet was with the cia from the beginning while the trade center was being packed with explosives i think which began during clinton's admin... and notice during the clinton admin, his cia director was changed 3 times. i think.

what a way to delay an op on your watch if you're president of the united states... change your cia director or let him get changed. i think clinton knew pnac, et al, were attempting to pull off the 911 op during his watch and he has contempt for the ordinary american, but thinks more highly of his legacy and his wife's future than he has contempt for the ordinary american and ambition for the new world order and the zionista/neocons and their creepy 4rth Reich cabal.

but the point of this email is that done in this realm what one sows, one reaps. if one lives down in this realm, one will be subject to it. and if they are hoping the web produces a change in china's government, they need to look at the bodies in their own back yard, such as the blood on the hands of the bushteam and all the dems and gop who are accessories or conspirators to the treason on 91101 at the wtc,not to mention the years of treason with the zionist israelis, the elite brits, the EU bilderberg arm, the money changers and soothsayers here and abroad on our wallets and on the ignorance of the ordinary american.

til the next time,
Ben Franklin Republican,
aka Andrea Psoras.

ps, Going forward, I will post what I have been promoting and crusading for years, and will respond as I am able to comments.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home